Wringing Wonder from the Arid Landscape of Law

Charles Wilkinson’s estimable contribution to public land law scholarship is widely cited but only partly understood. From the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s he upended the field by elevating the diffuse public interest, displacing creation and adjudication of private property interests as the field’s focus. However, his subsequent scholarship grappled with an even more important challenge that has been far less noted. Beginning in the late 1980s, Wilkinson explored how legal institutions should determine the pluralistic, public interest. In trailblazing articles and books, he rose to the challenge with site-specific details, compelling narratives, and aspirational themes. This work undermined the dominance of exogenous preference accounting as a means of identifying the public interest. Instead, often employing methods from the humanities, Wilkinson promoted planning as a deliberative, value-shaping process for crafting resource management objectives. His scholarship of the past thirty years redefined the relevant inquiries for public land law scholarship. In particular, he established bioregionalism, time, culture, and wonder as place-building concepts essential for translating justice and equity into public natural resources decisions.


Publication Date:
Sep 20 2017
Date Submitted:
Feb 27 2019
Citation:
Colorado Natural Resources, Energy & Environmental Law Review, 177
Note:
A freely accessible, full text version is available using the link(s) in External Resources.
External Resources:




 Record created 2019-02-27, last modified 2019-04-03


Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)