Flying vs. Jump Kicks: Defining Ordinary Action in Sport

Megenty was injured while holding a standing padded bag when a fellow karate participant performed a jump kick instead of a flying kick into the bag. The Megenity v. Dunn ruling supports the general concept of primary assumption of risk and places the responsibility of understanding the associated risks of a sport on the participants.


Publication Date:
Jan 05 2018
Date Submitted:
Jul 10 2019
ISSN:
0730-3084
Citation:
Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance

Note: The file is under embargo until: 2020-12-31



 Record created 2019-07-10, last modified 2019-07-11

postprint:
Download fulltext
PDF

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)