Dispersive analysis of $\eta \rightarrow 3 \pi$

The dispersive analysis of the decay $\eta \rightarrow 3 \pi$ is reviewed and thoroughly updated with the aim of determining the quark mass ratio $Q^2=(m_s^2-m_{ud}^2)/(m_d^2-m_u^2)$ . With the number of subtractions we are using, the effects generated by the final state interaction are dominated by low energy $\pi\pi$ scattering. Since the corresponding phase shifts are now accurately known, causality and unitarity determine the decay amplitude within small uncertainties – except for the values of the subtraction constants. Our determination of these constants relies on the Dalitz plot distribution of the charged channel, which is now measured with good accuracy. The theoretical constraints that follow from the fact that the particles involved in the transition represent Nambu–Goldstone bosons of a hidden approximate symmetry play an equally important role. The ensuing predictions for the Dalitz plot distribution of the neutral channel and for the branching ratio $\varGamma _{\eta \rightarrow 3\pi ^0}/ \varGamma _{\eta \rightarrow \pi ^+\pi ^-\pi ^0}$ are in very good agreement with experiment. Relying on a known low-energy theorem that relates the meson masses to the masses of the three lightest quarks, our analysis leads to 𝑄=22.1(7) , where the error covers all of the uncertainties encountered in the course of the calculation: experimental uncertainties in decay rates and Dalitz plot distributions, noise in the input used for the phase shifts, as well as theoretical uncertainties in the constraints imposed by chiral symmetry and in the evaluation of isospin breaking effects. Our result indicates that the current algebra formulae for the meson masses only receive small corrections from higher orders of the chiral expansion, but not all of the recent lattice results are consistent with this conclusion.


Publication Date:
Nov 01 2018
Date Submitted:
Jun 28 2019
Citation:
European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
78
11
External Resources:




 Record created 2019-06-28, last modified 2019-08-06


Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)